The Universe - Beta Model

Pradeep’s Theory of Certainty

Probably one of the thoroughly follwed thought experiments is ‘throwing a ball into the air’. The experiment then taught laws of motion. Throw a ball with initial velocity, u or think of that.  We introduce concepts of acceleration, force eventually. The motion of ball is almost accurately predictable involving in the parameters like gravity. To make the outcome more precise, one may include in the equation, the second order effects like air drag. At some highest order of complexity in the model one should predict the whole details.

Likewise the story of conservation of momentum when balls collide follows the argument. So is the story for every physical process and the moral being, “at some highest order of complexity in the model one predicts the whole details”. Hence there is a specific model for the universe also. The first collision in the universe happened and one may name it “Big bang” or whatever. It has its own model, equally certain to give the details of all subsequent outcomes to the fullest degree (to be defined in the need of context).

For the ease of understanding the model some type of collisions may be called chemical and some as physics based, of course biological too. But in the perspective of universe all are just certain futuristic outcomes on time axis. So why should biological collisions be an exception from the model?!!!!!!!!!! No reason. They are just a form of conception for ease of study. So what happens is already defined. In essence there is nothing uncertain about what happens. It just has to happen. No alternatives. There is no reason why humans and human systems are exceptions for the model. Whatever is the output prediction at a given stage of the cascaded events, will certainly happen. Everything that is witnessed or not has always been an ardently obeyed instance of the model… for now, “Universe – Beta Model”. There are no ifs and no buts. The term probability is an absolute nonsense in the picture unless a lower degree model is considered and yet a lower degree model substitutes the requirement of coinage of the word probability by predicting the behavior of certain level of entropy depending on the degree of the model.

No proof or argument can disprove the model. If something is attempted that still is an outcome of the model itself. This beta version at this instance stumbles only if the concept of ‘God’ is brought into the picture. I strongly encourage anyone attempting to contradict the model to use the lead. The beta model then cannot answer if man is God’s creativity or if God is man’s creativity!!!!!!!