Monday, April 11, 2011

How the innocent Pak Squad was deceived by Indian hosts!!! Deceptive WC-menu 2011 :P

Well Afridi feels that, that the Indian counter parts are not as open-hearted as their squadron! May be he drew the inferences from what someone like Paracha from the same Dawn News said in his words as "This is an outrage. How can we be so quiet about losing to India? We should thoroughly investigate the debacle. We shouldn’t have lost that game–simply because we are meat eaters!
Thus, my first objection is based on certain disturbing but confirmed reports: The Pakistan team was served only vegetables during its stay in Mohali. That’s why Umar Gul looked disoriented, Mishbah was so slow and Afridi delayed taking the power play. And anyway, what good is power play to a vegetarian, no?
Reports coming from Mohali also state that the night before the game, Afridi and the boys were lured by certain Hindus posing as Muslims into going to a restaurant that only served vegetable thali. Can you imagine, our meat eating boys having veg thalis?
That’s why God did not listen to the prayers of 18 trillion meaty Pakistanis. Our current team should learn from great Pakistani players of yore, like Inzimamul Haq, Saeed Anwar and Mohammad Yusuf, who are these days running a successful chain of meat stores. They know where their roots lie: In the land of fat, male camels.
Even more disturbing were reports about the players’ discipline. Famous cricket-jihadist and journalist, Sangsar, told me that he found a dozen or so carrots in the mini-fridge in Afridi’s hotel room, while Umar Gul and Misbah were seen carrying a kaddu (pumpkin) in the hotel’s lobby. When Sangsar spotted them, they claimed that the pumpkin was actually a lamb which they, along with Wahab Riaz, were planning to eat, absolutely raw. But Sangsar is no fool. He knew the players were still high on the thali.
Devastated by the sight, Sangsar began to weep and told them that they were worse than Raymond Davis who at least ate meat. He also contacted the team’s manager, Waqar Yunus, who at the time was having a swim in the hotel’s not surprisingly eggplant shaped swimming pool.
‘Sir, your team has converted,’ Sangsar told him. ‘They are having vegetables! How can you expect them to play like manly Muslims tomorrow? How can you expect God to listen to the 18 zillion meaty Pakistanis when their cricket team is chewing bhindi and kaddu and mooli?’
Waqar tried to cool Sangsar down by telling him that these were just rumours and that the boys were sticking to their diet of total meat and in fact, the team had been travelling with its own stock of goats, cows and chicken. When Sangsar said that he’d seen some players chewing carrots and watching Indian films in their hotel rooms, Waqar calmed him down again by saying that the boys were only trying to understand the mindset of the Indian players, that’s all.
Convinced, Sangsar pleaded that the future of Kashmir, Afghanistan, Palestine, Bosnia, Sudan, Somalia, Libya, Bahrain and the Vatican were riding on the shoulders of a Pakistani victory. To this, Waqar said he would try his best and then ordered a chicken tikka for Sangsar. But Sangsar refused, saying he can’t have a tikka prepared by a non-Muslim. ‘Don’t worry,’ Waqar replied, ‘the tikka is from the team’s own stock of poultry. It is a doosra kind of tikka, prepared by our very own Saeed Ajmal.’
Swayed by Waqar’s assurances, Sangsar said that he hoped the Pakistan team after it won against India and then the world cup, would not celebrate victory by throwing carrots, potatoes and eggplants at each another, to which Waqar said: ‘Of course, not! We plan to do a victory lap of the stadium riding camels and fire AK-47s in the air. Then, God willing, we will conquer Delhi!’
Happy and content with what Waqar told him, Sangsar went back to his room. But, of course, Pakistan lost. They played like vegetarians! Even Gambhir, who usually looks as being lacking calcium, showed more teeth in his batting than the Pakistanis; whereas Ashish Nehra, who seems to be always suffering from iron deficiency, bowled faster than Umar Gul.
Devastated and heart-broken, Sangsar appeared on his TV channel and angrily asked the 18 gazillion meaty Pakistanis to go out and save their country’s honour by boycotting Indian films, TV soaps and, of course, by burning down Karachi’s famous vegetable market, the Sabzi Mandi. Alas, we still have some honour left in us."

As of now and may be only for now, dumped  from http://www.dawn.com/2011/04/10/smokers-corner-wheres-the-beef.html, amidst local clutter of incidences creating mind-absence :P

Tuesday, February 1, 2011

The Universe - Beta Model



Pradeep’s Theory of Certainty

Probably one of the thoroughly follwed thought experiments is ‘throwing a ball into the air’. The experiment then taught laws of motion. Throw a ball with initial velocity, u or think of that.  We introduce concepts of acceleration, force eventually. The motion of ball is almost accurately predictable involving in the parameters like gravity. To make the outcome more precise, one may include in the equation, the second order effects like air drag. At some highest order of complexity in the model one should predict the whole details.
Likewise the story of conservation of momentum when balls collide follows the argument. So is the story for every physical process and the moral being, “at some highest order of complexity in the model one predicts the whole details”. Hence there is a specific model for the universe also. The first collision in the universe happened and one may name it “Big bang” or whatever. It has its own model, equally certain to give the details of all subsequent outcomes to the fullest degree (to be defined in the need of context).
For the ease of understanding the model some type of collisions may be called chemical and some as physics based, of course biological too. But in the perspective of universe all are just certain futuristic outcomes on time axis. So why should biological collisions be an exception from the model?!!!!!!!!!! No reason. They are just a form of conception for ease of study. So what happens is already defined. In essence there is nothing uncertain about what happens. It just has to happen. No alternatives. There is no reason why humans and human systems are exceptions for the model. Whatever is the output prediction at a given stage of the cascaded events, will certainly happen. Everything that is witnessed or not has always been an ardently obeyed instance of the model… for now, “Universe – Beta Model”. There are no ifs and no buts. The term probability is an absolute nonsense in the picture unless a lower degree model is considered and yet a lower degree model substitutes the requirement of coinage of the word probability by predicting the behavior of certain level of entropy depending on the degree of the model.
No proof or argument can disprove the model. If something is attempted that still is an outcome of the model itself. This beta version at this instance stumbles only if the concept of ‘God’ is brought into the picture. I strongly encourage anyone attempting to contradict the model to use the lead. The beta model then cannot answer if man is God’s creativity or if God is man’s creativity!!!!!!!